Preview

Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal

Advanced search

Surgical treatment of varicocele: shunting, occlusive and endovascular interventions

https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2021.5.2.1376

Abstract

The frequency of recurrence after surgical treatment of varicocele reaches 29%. This circumstance encourages the medical community to search for the optimal surgical aid to prevent pathological reflux of blood into the venous plexuses of the testicle from the overlying parts of the vascular network. The operation is indicated in case of presence of the clinical symptoms, the development of orchopathy and disorders of spermatogenesis, regardless of the degree of development of varicocele (WHO classification 2010). Operations aimed at eliminating varicocele are divided into 2 large groups: the first group – preserving the renocaval shunt or shunting operations and the second group – not preserving the renocaval shunt or occlusive operations. Shunting operations include the creation of intervenous anastomoses: proximal, distal and bidirectional. Proximal anastomoses are aimed at eliminating renal venous hypertension as the direct cause of the disease. The imposition of bidirectional and distal anastomoses is considered inappropriate, since in the first case, the time of surgical intervention increases, and in the second case, renal hypertension is not eliminated. Occlusive operations are indicated for primary varicocele and the absence of pronounced venous hypertension. According to the level of vein ligation, they are divided into supra-inguinal and sub-inguinal, by selectivity into selective and non-selective, and by operative access into open, laparoscopic and endovascular. The lowest number of relapses and postoperative complications is observed in sub-inguinal selective and endovascular techniques. They are the most universal ones and eliminate all hemodynamic types of varicocele. Supra-inguinal selective techniques show their high effectiveness in the renospermatic type of varicocele and, unlike sub-inguinal operations, there is no risk of damage to the testicular artery during the operation. Thus, a differentiated approach to choosing the type of surgery reduces the risk of postoperative complications and prevents recurrence of the disease.

About the Authors

I. Dub
State Institution “432nd Holder of Order of the Red Star Main Military Clinical Medical Center of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus”
Belarus


M. Doronin
State Institution “432nd Holder of Order of the Red Star Main Military Clinical Medical Center of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus”
Belarus


S. Stoma
State Institution “432nd Holder of Order of the Red Star Main Military Clinical Medical Center of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus”
Belarus


R. Kurlenko
State Institution “432nd Holder of Order of the Red Star Main Military Clinical Medical Center of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus”
Belarus


References

1. Bavilsky V.F., Suvorov A.V., Ivanov A.V., Gubnitsky D.A., Kandalov A.M., Sagalov A.V. Vybor metoda operativnogo lecheniya varicocele [Selection of the method of surgical treatment of varicocele]. Urologiya, 2003, no. 6, рр. 40-43. (in Russian).

2. Berdnikov M.A., Antipov N.V. Varikocele: sovremennaya problema [Varicocele: a modern problem]. Zhurnal fundamentalnoj mediciny i biologii, 2016, no. 3, pp. 42-50. (in Russian).

3. Beshliev D.A. Varikocele. Klassifikaciya, diagnostika, lechenie [Varicocele. Classification, diagnosis, treatment]. Trudnyj pacient, 2007, vol. 5, no. 12, рр. 9-13. (in Russian).

4. Bolotov D.F. Nekotorye osobennosti i rezul’taty laparoskopicheskogo lecheniya varikocele u detej i podrostkov. [Some features and results of laparoscopic treatment of varicoceles in children and adolescents]. Endoskopicheskaya hirurgiya, 2001, no. 2, рр. 10. (in Russian).

5. Razumovskij A.Yu. et al. Varikocele u detej i podrostkov: klinicheskie rekomendacii [Varicocele in children and adolescents: clinical recommendations]. Moscow, MZ RF, 2016, 32 p. (in Russian).

6. Garipov R.M., Galimov O.V., Ishmetov V.SH., CHudnovec L.G., Hanov V.O., Muhametzyanov I.F., Gumerova G.T., SHimkov O.S. Rentgenenodovaskulyarnyj metod lecheniya dvustoronnego varikocele, oslozhnennogo reproduktivnoj disfunkciej [Case of elimination of bilateral varicocele complicated by reproductive dysfunction]. Permskij medicinskij zhurnal, 2009, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106-109. (in Russian).

7. Efremov E.A., Kastrikin Yu.V., Melnik Ya.I., Simakov V.V., Edoyan T.A., Butov A.O. Rezultaty primeneniya maloinvazivnogo moshonochnogo dostupa vypolneniya mikrohirurgicheskoj varikocelektomii [Results of minimally invasive scrotum access application of microsurgical varicocelectomy]. Eksperimentalnaya i klinicheskaya urologiya, 2019, no. 1, рр. 115-119. (in Russian).

8. Zhukov O.B., Verzin A.V., Penkov P.L. Regionarnaya pochechnaya vennaya gipertenziya i levostoronnee varikocele [Regional renal venous hypertension and left-handed varicocele]. Andrologiya i genitalnaya hirurgiya, 2013, no. 3, pp. 29-37. (in Russian).

9. Kamalov A.A., Adamyan R.T., Verzin A.V., Burov V.N., Efremov E.A., Penkov P.L., Pupkova T.N. Mikrohirurgicheskie testikulo-nizhneepigastralnye anastomozy v lechenii varicocele [Microsurgical testiculo-lower epigastric anastomoses in the treatment of varicocele]. Trudnyj pacient, 2006, vol. 4, no. 8, рр. 9-12. (in Russian).

10. Kapto A.A. Operativnyj dostup po linii Vislinga pri varikocele [Online Visling Access for Varicocele]. Andrologiya i genitalnaya hirurgiya, 2016, vol. 17, no. 4, рр. 44-48. (in Russian).

11. Kolpakov V.T., Pykov M.I. Varikocele [Varicocele]. Moscow: Vidar-M, 2000. 102 р. (in Russian).

12. Loran О.В., Sokolyshchik M.M., Gagarina S.V., Stoiko Yu.M., Golitsyn A.V. Vybor metoda hirurgicheskoj korrekcii varikocele s uchetom osobennostej venoznoj gemodinamiki [Selection of a method of surgical correction of varicocele taking intoaccount the features of venous hemodynamics]. Urologiya, 2006, no. 5, рр. 24-29. (in Russian).

13. Neimark A.I., Neimark B.A., Davydov A.V., Saldan I.P., Nozdrachev N.A. Reabilitaciya pacientov s muzhskim besplodiem posle varikocelektomii [Rehabilitation of male infertility patients after varicocelectomy]. Effektivnaya farmakoterapmya, 2018, no. 9, рр. 8-12. (in Russian).

14. Hinman F. Operativnaya urolgiya [Operative urology]. Moscow: GEOTAR-MED, 2001. 1192 р. (in Russian).

15. Lopatkin A.N., Shevcov I.P. eds. Operativnaya urologiya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachej [Operative urology: a guide for doctors]. L.: Medicina, 1986. 479 р. (in Russian).

16. Polyaev Yu.A., Garbuzov R.V. Rentgenoendovaskulyarnaya diagnostika vtorichnogo varikocelemu podrostkov. Taktika hirurgicheskogo lecheniya [X-ray endascular diagnosis of adolescent secondary varicocelema. Surgical treatment tactics]. Rossijskij vestnik, 2011, no. 2, рр. 96-101. (in Russian).

17. Strakhov S.N., Pryadko S.I., Bondar Z.M., Kosyreva N.B. Varianty arhitektoniki, gemodinamiki levoj pochechnoj i yaichkovoj ven i vybor patogeneticheski obosnovannogo metoda hirurgicheskogo lecheniya levostoronnego varikocele [Variants of architectonics, hemodynamics of the left renal and testicular veins and the choice of a pathogenetically justified method of surgical treatment of left-sided varicocele]. Annaly hirurgii, 2014, no. 3, рр. 32-40. (in Russian).

18. Lopatkin N.A. eds. Spravochnik po urologii [Urology Handbook]. Moscow: Medicina, 1978. 327 р. (in Russian).

19. Lopatkin N.A. eds. Urologiya: klinicheskie rekomendacii [Urology: clinical recommendations]. Moscow: GEOTAR-media, 2007. 540 р. (in Russian).

20. Filippovich V.A. Antegradnaya moshonochnaya skleroterapiya varicocele [Antegrade scrotum sclerotherapy varicocele]. Zhurnal GGMU, 2005, no. 3, рр. 218-220. (in Russian).

21. Filippovich V.A. Gnyado Yu.V., Filippovich I.V. Antegradnaya moshonochnaya skleroterapiya varicocele [Antegrade scrotum sclerotherapy varicocele]. Zhurnal GGMU, 2007, no. 4, рр. 155-159. (in Russian).

22. Cayan S., Shavakhabov S., Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl, 2009, vol. 30(1), pp. 33-40. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005967.

23. Donovan J.F., Winfield. H.N. Laparoscopic varix ligation. J Urol, 1992, vol. 147(1), pp. 77-81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37138-0.

24. Donovan J.F., Winfield H.N. Laparoscopic varix ligation with the Nd:YAG laser. J Endourol, 1992, vol. 6, pp. 165-171.

25. Han D.-Y., Yang Q.-Y., Chen X., Ouyang B., Yao B., Liu G.-H., Zhang H., Xia K., Deng C.-H., Sun X.-Z. Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016, vol. 48(7), pp. 1017-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1246-7.

26. Wang J., Xia S.-J., Liu Z.-H., Tao L., Ge J.-F., Xu C.-M., Qiu J.-X. Inguinal and subinguinal microvaricocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a metaanalysis. Asian J Androl, 2015, vol. 17(1), pp. 74-80. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.136443.

27. Halpern J., Mittal S., Pereira K., Bhatia S., Ramasamy R. Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl, 2016, vol. 18(2), pp. 234-238. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.169985.

28. Male infertility. European Association guidelines. 2021. 1826 p.

29. Sharlip I.D., Jarow J.P., Belker A.M., Lipshultz L.I., Sigman M., Thomas A.J., Schlegel P.N., Howards S.S., Nehra A., Damewood M.D., Overstreet J.W., Sadovskyet R. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril, 2002, vol. 77(5), pp. 873-882. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9.

30. Schauer I., Madersbacher S., Jost R., Hubner W.A., Imhof M. The impact of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters:a meta-analysis. J Urol, 2012, vol. 187(5), pp. 1540-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.084.

31. Parekattil S.J., Gudeloglu A. Robotic assisted andrological surgery. Asian J Androl, 2013, vol. 15(1), pp. 67-74. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.131.


Review

For citations:


Dub I., Doronin M., Stoma S., Kurlenko R. Surgical treatment of varicocele: shunting, occlusive and endovascular interventions. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2021;5(2):1376–1385. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2021.5.2.1376

Views: 25


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2616-633X (Print)