Preview

Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal

Advanced search

Structural and functional cardiac remodeling in patients with arterial hypertension and progression of atrial fibrillation

https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2025.9.2.2571

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate cardiac remodeling based on echocardiographic parameters over time in patients with arterial hypertension (AH), with and without progression of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Materials and methods: The study includes 59 patients with AH and paroxysmal AF. The observation period was 20 [19.0; 25.0] months. The criteria for AF progression were considered to be the transition from paroxysmal to persistent or permanent forms, or an increase in the frequency and/or duration of arrhythmia episodes. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography.

Results: In patients with AF progression a deterioration in parameters reflecting left ventricular (LV) diastolic function was observed: an increased ratio of the transmitral peak velocity of early filling (peak E) relative to early diastolic septal mitral annular velocity (E/e’sept) (p = 0.01), the ratio of peak E to the average early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e’avg) (p = 0.02), and the peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (p = 0.03). In the group without AF progression, there was a decreased prevalence of left atrial (LA) dilatation by the LA volume index LV mass/height² (93.2% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.03). This group also showed a significant reduction in LV myocardial mass (LVMM) (p = 0.0005), LVMM/height2,7 (p = 0.0008), accompanied by a decreased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (65.9% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.04). Echocardiographic parameters of LVH correlate with dynamics in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion: Structural and functional cardiac remodeling is associated with AF progression, while reverse remodeling is associated with a favorable course of arrhythmia.

About the Authors

N. V. Bukvalnaya
Grodno State Medical University
Belarus

Grodno



L. V. Bukvalnaya
Grodno State Medical University
Belarus

Grodno



A. V. Pokalyuk
Grodno Regional Clinical Cardiology Center
Belarus

Grodno



V. A. Snezhetskiy
Grodno State Medical University
Belarus

Grodno



References

1. Van Gelder I.C., Rienstra M., Bunting K.V. et. al] ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J, 2024, vol. 45 (36), pp. 3314–3414.

2. Nguyen B.O., Weberndorfer V., Crijns H.J. et. al. Prevalence and determinants of atrial fibrillation progression in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart, 2022, vol. 109(3), pp. 186–194.

3. Snezhiczkij V.A., Deshko M.S., Pyrochkin V.M. et al. Atrial fibrillation: risk factors for development and progression, pathophysiological mechanisms, treatment strategy and tactics: Monograph. Grodno, 2024, 260 s. (in Russian).

4. Ionin V.A., Barashkova E.I., Filatova A.G. et al. Atrial fibrillation in st petersburg cohort: frequency, risk factors, antiarrhythmic therapy and thromboembolism prevention. Arterial’naya gipertenziya, 2020, vol. 26(2), pp. 192–201. (in Russian).

5. De Vos B., Breithardt G., Camm A.J. et. al. Progression of atrial fibrillation in the REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation cohort: clinical correlates and the effect of rhythm-control therapy. Am Heart J, 2012, vol. 163(5), pp. 887–893.

6. Khidirova L.D., Yakhontov D.A., Zenin S.A., Kuropii T.S. The impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension on the development and progression of atrial fibril lation. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention, 2019, vol. 18(5), pp. 138–144. (in Russian).

7. Mollaeva D.D., Mashina T.V., Mrikaev D.V. et al. Modern ultrasound techniques in the assessment of lef t atrium struc tural abnormalities in patients with atrial fibrillation. Creative cardiology, 2021, vol. 15(1), pp. 48–60. (in Russian).

8. Xiang H., Xue Y., Chen Z. et al. The Association Between Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Occurrence and Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, vol. 8, pp. 639993.

9. Kosiuk J., Belle V.Y., Bode K. et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation: predictors and relation with symptom severity. Electrophysiol, 2012, vol. 23(10), pp. 1073–1077.

10. De With R.R., Marcos E.G, Dudink Elton A.M.P. et al. Atrial fibrillation progression risk factors and associated cardiovascular outcome in well-phenotyped patients: data from the AF-RISK study. Europace, 2020, vol. 22(3), pp. 352–360.

11. Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V. et. al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2015, vol. 28(1), pp. 1–39.

12. Kobalava Zh.D., Konradi A.O., Nedogoda S.V. et al. Arterial hypertension in adults. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian journal of cardiology, 2020, vol. 25(3), pp. 149–218. (in Russian).

13. Tereshhenko S.N., Galyavich A.S., Uskach T.M. et al. 2020 clinical practice guidelines for chronic heart failure. Russian journal of cardiology, 2020, vol. 25(11), pp. 311–374. (in Russian).

14. Drapkina O.M., Dzhioeva O.N. Modern echocardiographic criteria for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: not only diastolic dysfunction. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention, 2020, vol. 19(2), pp. 66–74. (in Russian).

15. Hennersdorf M.G., Schueller P.O., Steiner S., Strauer B.E. Prevalence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation depending on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension. Hypertens Res, 2 0 07, vo l. 30(6), pp. 535–540.

16. Zhang K., Chen J., Liu Y. et. al. Diastolic blood pressure reduction contributes more to the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hum Hypertens, 2013, vol. 27(11), pp. 698–706.

17. Masuda M., Fujita M., Iida O. et. al. An E/e ratio on echocardiography predicts the existence of left atrial low-voltage areas and poor outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace, 2018, vol. 1(200, pp. e60–e68.

18. Li C., Ding X., Zhang J. et. al. Does the E/e index predict the maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? Echocardiography, 2010, vol. 27(6), pp. 630–636.

19. Kagawa Y., Fujii E., Fujita S.M. Association between left atrial reverse remodeling and maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Ito Heart Vessels, 2020, vol. 35(5), pp. 239–245.


Review

For citations:


Bukvalnaya N.V., Bukvalnaya L.V., Pokalyuk A.V., Snezhetskiy V.A. Structural and functional cardiac remodeling in patients with arterial hypertension and progression of atrial fibrillation. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2025;9(2):2571-2579. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2025.9.2.2571

Views: 29

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2616-633X (Print)