Preview

Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal

Advanced search

Are we underestimating the gradient in patients with aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: it’s time to consider ventricular preload

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the significance of variation in gradient beat-to-beat pressure gradients in patients with significant aortic stenosis and concomitant atrial fibrillation and determine its relationship to severity.
Methods: Assess the beat-to-beat variability of pressure gradients in patients significant aortic stenosis and concomitant atrial fibrillation from retrospective analysis of Doppler or catheter-based hemodynamic measurements and correlate with the preceding RR interval based on the corresponding electrocardiogram. Results: There is a direct correlation between the preceding RR interval and the mean pressure gradient in patients with significant aortic stenosis and concomitant atrial fibrillation. The variation seems to be more prominent in those with severe stenosis and preserved left ventricular function and may aid in classifying the degree of stenosis as severe in some with seemingly more moderate stenosis based on traditional averaging of consecutive beats.
Conclusions: Variation in pressure gradients beat-to-beat are important to consider in patients with aortic stenosis and concomitant atrial fibrillation and correlate with severity and contractile characteristics.

About the Authors

S. Hayman
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


P. Diamantouros
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


R. Bagur
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


M. Chu
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


B. Kiaii
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


B. Dias
Health Sciences Centre
United Kingdom


P. Teefy
University of Western Ontario
Canada


References

1. Levy F., Rusinaru D., Marechaux S., Charles V., Peltier M., Tribouilloy C. Determinants and prognosis of atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol, 2015, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 1541-1546.

2. Baumgartner H., Hung J., Bermejo J., Chambers J., Evangelista A., Griffin B. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-23.

3. Khan A., Picard M. Challenges in the echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis. Future Cardiology, 2014, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.541-542.

4. Awtry E., Davidoff R. Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation, 2011, vol. 124, no. 23, pp. e739-e741.

5. Burup Kristensen C., Jensen J.S., Sogaard P., Carstensen H.G., Mogelvang R. Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis – echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance. Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2012, vol. 10, pp. 38. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-38.

6. Wiley B.M., Pollack A., Vaidya A.S., Agarwal S.K., Sengupta P.P., Chaudhry F.A. Post-Extrasystolic Transaortic Valve Gradients Differentiate "Pseudo" and "True" Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe AS During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 1199-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.024. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

7. Bhave NM, Patel AR, Shah AP, Lang RM. Postextrasystolic potentiation in lowgradient, severe aortic stenosis: a poor man's stress echo? Echocardiography, 2013, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. e148-e151.


Review

For citations:


Hayman S., Diamantouros P., Bagur R., Chu M., Kiaii B., Dias B., Teefy P. Are we underestimating the gradient in patients with aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: it’s time to consider ventricular preload. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2018;2(1):216-220.

Views: 17


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2616-633X (Print)