Е.Н. Сергиенко, О.Н. Романова
Белорусский государственный медицинский университет
Диагностика сепсиса в реанимации требует междисциплинарного подхода. Нет сомнений, что клиническая картина также важна при постановке диагноза. Тем не менее, такие признаки, как лихорадка, тахипноэ, тахикардия и т.д. не являются конкретными. Вот почему использование интегрированных диагностических и прогностических шкал и мониторинг метаболизма, гемодинамики, микроциркуляции, а также специфических биомаркеров являются более важными для практиков.
ключевые слова: сепсис, шкалы, биомаркеры, диагностика, дети

для цитирования: Е.Н. Сергиенко, О.Н. Романова. Сепсис у детей: клиническая и лабораторная диагностика. Неотложная кардиология и кардиоваскулярные риски, 2020, Т. 4, № 1, С. 925–931

Sepsis in children: clinical and laboratory diagnosis
E.N. Serhiyenka, O.N. Romanova
Diagnosis of sepsis in intensive care requires an interdisciplinary approach. There is no doubt that the clinical picture is also important when making a diagnosis. However, signs such as fever, tachypnea, tachycardia, etc. are not specific. This is why the use of integrated diagnostic and prognostic scales and monitoring of metabolism, hemodynamics, microcirculation, and specific biomarkers are more important for practitioners.
keywords: sepsis, scales, biomarkers, diagnostics, children

for references: E.N. Serhiyenka, O.N. Romanova. Sepsis in children: clinical and laboratory diagnosis. Neotlozhnaya kardiologiya i kardiovaskulyarnye riski [Emergency cardiology and cardiovascular risks], 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 925–931

1. Rudnov V.A. Kulabuhov V.V. Sepsis-3: obnovlenny’e klyuchevy’e polojeniya, potencial’ny’e problemy’ i dal’neyshie prakticheskie shagi [Sepsis-3: updated key provisions, potential problems, and further practical steps]. Vestn. anesteziologii i reanimatologii, 2016, vol. 13, no. 4, s. 4-11. (in Russian).
2. Lekmanov A.U., Mironov P.I., Rudnov V.A., Kulabuhov V.V. Sovremenny’e definicii i principy’ intensivnoy terapii sepsisa u detey [Modern definitions and principles of intensive care for sepsis in children]. Vestn. anesteziologii i reanimatologii, 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, s. 61-69. (in Russian).
3. Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.-D., Coopersmith C.M., Hotchkiss R.S., Levy M.M., Marshall J.C., Martin G.S., Opal S.M., Rubenfeld G.D., van der Poll T., Vincent J.-L., Angus D.C. The third International consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 801-810.
4. Travis Matics J., Sanchez-Pinto L.N. Adaptation and validation of a pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of the sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children. JAMA Pediatrics, 2017, vol. 171, no. 10, pp. e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.
5. Lanziotti V.S., Póvoa P., Soares M., Silva J.R.L.E., Barbosa A.P., Salluh J.I.F. Use of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: literature review. Rev. Bras. Ter. Intensiva, 2016, vol. 28 no. 4, pp. 472-482.
6. Randolph A.G., McCulloh R.J. Pediatric sepsis: important considerations for diagnosing and managing severe infections in infants, children, and adolescents. Virulence, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 179-189.
7. Schlapbach L.J., Kissoon N. Defining pediatric sepsis. JAMA Pediatric, 2018, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 312-314.
8. Rhodes A., Evans L.E., Alhazzani W., Levy M.M., Antonelli M., Ferrer R., Kumar A., Sevransky J.E., Sprung C.L., Nunnally M.E., Rochwerg B., Rubenfeld G.D., Angus D.C., Annane D., Beale R.J., Bellinghan G.J. [et al.] Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit. Care Med, 2017, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 486-552.
9. Tepaev R.F. Klinicheskie rekomendacii po diagnostike sepsisa u detey [Clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of sepsis in children]. Pediatr. farmakologii, 2015, vol. 12, no. 2, s. 205-208. (in Russian).
10. Kawasaki T. Update on pediatric sepsis: a review [Electronic resource]. J. of intensive care, 2017, vol. 5, no. 47. Available at: https://jintensivecare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40560-017-0240-1. (accessed 12.01.2020).
11. Emr B.M., Alcamo A.M., Carcillo J.A., Aneja R.K., Mollen K.P. Pediatric sepsis update: how are children different? Surgical infections, 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 176-183.
12. Hacko V.V. Potapov V.V., Zenin O.K. E`tiologiya, patogenez i diagnostika sepsisa (obzor literatury’) [Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis (literature review)]. Med. nauki, 2017, vol. 43, no. 3, s. 139-150. (in Russian).
13. Hotchkiss R.S., Moldawer L., Opal S.M., Reinhart K. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 16045. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.45.
14. Stoma I.O. Klinicheskoe znachenie markerov sepsisa u pacientov s febril’noy ney-tropeniey [Clinical significance of sepsis markers in patients with febrile neutropenia]. Lab. diagnostika. Vostochnaya Evropa, 2015, no. 3-4, s. 126-133. (in Russian).
15. Sapicheva YU.YU., Lihvancev V.V., Petrovskaya E`.L., Lopatin A.F. Taktika vedeniya pacientov s sepsisom i septicheskim shokom v mnogoprofil’nom stacionare : ucheb. posobie [Tactics for managing patients with sepsis and septic shock in a multidisciplinary hospital: studies. stipend]. M. : Moniki, 2015, 35 s. (in Russian).
16. Leclerc F. Duhamel A., Deken V., Grandbastien B., Leteurtre S. Can the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 score on day 1 be used in clinical criteria for sepsis in children? Pediatric. Crit. Care Med, 2017, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 758-763.
17. Dewi R., Somasetia D.H., Risan N.A. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and its correlation with severity based on pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score in pediatric sepsis. Am. J. of Epidemiology and Infectious Dis., 2016, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 64-67.
18. Matics T.J., Sanchez-Pinto L.N. Adaptation and validation of a pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score and evaluation of the Sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children. JAMA Pediatr, 2017, vol. 171, no. 10, pp. e172352.
19. Schlapbach L.J. , Straney L., Bellomo R., MacLaren G., Pilcher D. Prognostic accuracy of age-adapted SOFA, SIRS, PELOD-2, and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among children with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. Int. Care Med, 2018, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 179-188.
20. Kawasaki T., Shime N., Straney L., Bellomo R., MacLaren G., Pilcher D., Schlapbach L.J. Pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score (pSOFA): a plea for the world-wide collaboration for consensus. Int. Care Med, 2018, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 995-997. doi.org/10.1007/s00134–018–5188–7.
21. Golobokov G.S., Cvetkov V.V., Tokin I.I., SHeyanov S.D., Levashova A.B., Lioznov D.A. Diagnosticheskie i prognosticheskie laboratorny’e kriterii razvitiya sepsisa prignoyno-vospalitel’ny’h zabolevaniyah myagkih tkaney [Diagnostic and prognostic laboratory criteria for the development of sepsis in purulent-inflammatory soft tissue diseases]. Jurn. infektologii, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, s. 53-62. (in Russian).
22. Astaf’eva M.N., Rudnov S.YU., Kulabuhov V.V., Bagin V.A., Zubareva N.A., Tribule’v M.A., Muhacheva S.YU. Ispol’zovanie shkaly’ qSOFA v prognoze ishoda u pacientov s sepsisom v ORIT (rezul’taty’ rossiyskogo mnogocentrovogo issledovaniya RISE`S [Using the qSOFA scale in predicting the outcome of patients with sepsis in ICU (results of the Russian multicenter study of RISEC)]. Vestn. anesteziologii i reanimatologii, 2018, vol. 15, no. 5, s. 22-29. (in Russian).
23. Bulava G.V., Androsova M.V., SHabanov A.K., Nikitina O.V., Aleksandrova I.V. Prediktory’ sepsisa u pacientov s neotlojny’mi sostoyaniyami [Predictors of sepsis in patients with emergency conditions]. Jurn. im. N.V. Sklifosovskogo Neotloj. med. pomosch, 2017, vol. 6, no. 1, s. 13-19. (in Russian).
24. Bogacheva V.V., Gardovska D.H. Markery’ sepsisa. XXI vek [Markers of sepsis. XXI century]. Terapevt. arh, 2014, no. 3, s. 111-114. (in Russian).
25. Weiss S.L., Peters M.J. Focus on paediatrics: 2017. Int. Care Med, 2018, vol. 44, pp. 235-237. doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5025-4.
26. Ivyanskaya E.V., Gal’china O.V., Belyaeva J.G., Ivyanskiy S.A., Soldatov O.M. Vy’sokochuvstvitel’ny’e markery’ v diagnostike septicheskih oslojneniy [Highly sensitive markers in the diagnosis of septic complications]. Klin. lab. diagnostika, 2013, no. 9 [XVII forum «Nacional’ny’e dni labotatornoy mediciny’ Rossii - 2013», Moskva, 1-3 okt. 2013 g.], s. 59-60. (in Russian).
27. Jilinskiy E.V., Alekseev S.A., Jenzerova I.A., Bly’ga E.G. Primenenie presepsina i prokal’citonina v diagnostike sepsisa u tyajelo obojjenny’h pacientov [Use of presepsin and procalcitonin in the diagnosis of sepsis in severely burned patients]. E`kstrennaya medicina, 2015, vol. 15, no. 3, s. 35-42. (in Russian).
28. Haerty’nov H.S., Anohin V.A., Rizvanov A.A., Marty’nova E.V., Lyubin S.A. Provospalitel’ny’y citokinovy’y profil’ u detey s neonatal’ny’m sepsisom [Proinflammatory cytokine profile in children with neonatal sepsis]. Ros. vestn. perinatologii i pediatrii, 2017, vol. 62, no. 5, s. 93-100. (in Russian).
29. Schlapbach L.J., MacLaren G., Festa M., Alexander J.L, Erickson S., Beca J., Slater A.M., Schibler A., Pilcher D., Millar J., Straney L.D. Prediction of pediatric sepsis mortality within 1h of intensive care admission. Int. Care Med, 2017, vol. 43, pp. 1085-1096.
30. Napolitano L.M. Sepsis 2018: definitions and guideline changes. Surgical infections, 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 117-127.
31. Endo S., SuzukiY., Takahashi G., Shozushima T., Ishikura H., Murai A., Nishida T., Irie Y., Miura M., Iguchi H., Fukui Y., Tanaka K., Nojima T., Okamura Y. Presepsin as a powerful monitoring tool for the prognosis and treatment of sepsis: A multicenter prospective study. J. Infect Chemother, 2014, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 30-34.
Формат файла: pdf (414.3 Кб)